Comments

  • <font face="Arial, Verdana" size="2">Yes, well done to all involved.</font><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><br></div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; ">A few things though. No mention of the barber shop "<span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">exchanging the woman’s phone for cash". Sounds like something they may do on a regular basis and should probably be banged up for handling stolen goods if nothing else.</span></div><div style="font-family: Arial, Verdana; font-size: 10pt; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal; "><span style="font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; "><br></span></div><div><span style="font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px; text-align: left; ">Also, why only 10 years? It says "</span><span style="text-align: left; "><font face="Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif"><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 18px;">Bramble – who was only released from prison in 2008 after serving half of a 27-year sentence for a spate of more than 100 burglaries in the 90s". Surely after being released early and committing new offences people should immediately be returned to prison to serve out the remainder of their previous sentence plus extra for the new offence on top. In this case I would say he should be going to prison for 23.5 years.</span></font></span></div>
Sign In or Register to comment.