Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Categories
In this Discussion
Top Posters
- Arkady 5356
- miss annie 5139
- andy 4506
- Ali 3397
- krappyrubsnif 3205
- tosscat 2291
- David 2179
- ADGS 1875
- kreuzkav 1732
- Mirandola 1618
Comments
I'd say I like some impacts of the smoking ban (in clubs and concert venues for instance), but also think that some happy medium needs to be reached - smokers get enough grief as it is, without being completely ostracised from every social venue. They'll be coming for our beer next...
Is there ever any point working to have laws such as this revoked or reworked? It seems a good number of 'right thinking folk' consider it draconian that politicians and unelected medical people get to decide what's best for us, rather than just running services for us?
*impressed*
However, it has spent a considerable amount of money, time and imagination in coming up with something that means it can comply with the law to stop people smoking in the pub, while still offering many of its customers what they want - the chance to go to the pub and have a cigarette.
The Fullback is a proper pub. Whether it's your cup of tea or not, there's no denying it has a regular local clientele and does well for itself. Pre-ban I seem to remember an awful lot of those people smoking. Post ban, I don't see any more people rushing in to take advantage of the smoke free atmosphere.
Non smokers now have the whole pub and the upstairs bit which is properly outside, the only bit they could want to avoid is the downstairs bit of the garden. I'm sure anyone wanting to avoid smoke that badly could just choose another area.
But nope, that's not enough for Haringey council. It has already stopped people doing the classic London pub thing and standing out on the street in the sunshine with a pint since the smoking ban, as they used to be able to.
I'm impressed by Lynne looking at this, please consider the spirit of the pub's alterations rather than the letter of the law.
Taff, you're letting the Park Tavern is great secret out
Pubs will have a certain agreed boundary with the council, or not. Theoretically you should stay within this. Typically it spills over and is generally tolerated but the council can crack down and threaten the pub.
I always recall quite a few people standing out in Perth / Ennis Road with a pint in the evening sunshine and have done it myself. Round about the time the smoking ban came in, and maybe when the garden was turned into an ewok village, the pub stopped people doing this and I was told it was because the council had told them it was no longer allowed.
Presumable the Fullback has no front outside permitted area, as the pavement is narrow, although as it's on the meeting point of two quiet roads, I didn't ever see how this was a problem.
Anyway - here is the text of their response to me. Given we are dealing with planning law - don't think there is much to be done other than the pub arguing its case when the retrospective planning application comes up for decision.
Best
Lynne
Dear Lynne Featherstone MP
Re: Size regulations for outside covered smoking areas for public houses: The Faltering Fullback, Stroud Green Road
Thank you for your email dated 08 September 2009 regarding the above premises.
The Enforcement officer involved in this public house’s case has confirmed that the “outside covered area” on the ground floor of the garden does not comply with the smoke free legislation.
The officer visited the premises and a letter was sent confirming the actions that were required to be taken by the proprietors of the premises. In the letter the officer confirmed that the area was deemed to be “substantially enclosed”.
The guidelines state that premises are “substantially enclosed” if they have a ceiling or roof, but there are permanent openings in the walls which are less than half of the total areas of walls, including other structures which serve the purpose of walls and constitute the perimeter of the premises. This is known as the 50% rule, put simply:
If more than 50% of the walls are present then it is illegal to smoke in the area.
A roof includes any fixed or moveable structure such as a canvas awning.
In the officer’s opinion, the area on the ground floor cannot be altered to be compliant as the roof acts as the flooring of the mezzanine level. If the proprietor believes that the area can be altered then we would suggest he provides the officer with a scaled plan of the area showing the changes / alterations to be made.
In regards to your query concerning the planning application, our Planning Service confirms that a retrospective planning application was received on 26 August 2009 which is receiving attention. As part of the planning consultation, we would be advising that the structure as drawn is not compliant with the legislation and guidance under the Health Act 2006.
I trust the above is of assistance. Please contact me if you have any questions.
Regards
Robin Payne
Head of Enforcement
Haringey Council
<img src="http://freakytrigger.co.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/ewok.jpg" width=200>
There are people under 30 who barely remember the fall of the Berlin Wall.
<img src="http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/scary.png" width=425>