Has anyone been refused house insurance on the basis of the area being prone to subsidence. We back onto the parkland walk and are having problems. Everyone we have approached has refused to insure us (3 converted flats in terraced house). Our current insurer has offered to re-insure by doubling the premium, having a 5000 excess and having to cover 25% of any claim. Outrageous, I know, but hoping there might be someone out there who has been in a similar position and has resolved it. The latest owners of one of the flats had to send their survey to the insurance company and as it states movement (which I think any house built in 1870 would have) they were at first unwilling to re-insure, and now these outrageous term.<div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div><div><br></div></div>
Comments