i'm going to see how good google is at targeting ads by listing increasingly obscure references and seeing if google can provide a relevant ad at the side. yes i'm bored.
their dartboard - like targeting depends on quite a few factors (much like being able hit a dartboard with some darts), not least is the relevancy of the content and the number of times that you mention the keyword (dartboards have numbers too)...
Hosts toggle. That's an interesting phrase. Hosts. Toggle. It's a shame you never got a result from Hosts Toggle. Did you try toggles host?
Host toggle.
Aaaaah, no, it do work, but it scans for word over the site as a whole. That advert is the "same" advert inserted into the stylesheet, yes? So all the links to google from the same code analyses everything the code is next to.
In short, if you had lots of different google ad codes and had them on a random loop, the ads would be more associated to fewer words. Meaning the weirder keywords would come through.
Comments
net curtains
net curtains
net curtains
net curtains
NET BLOODY CURTAINS
how about:
cleft pallette
cleft pallette
cleft pallette
Pneumoconiosis compensation
Pneumoconiosis compensation
In short, if you had lots of different google ad codes and had them on a random loop, the ads would be more associated to fewer words. Meaning the weirder keywords would come through.