Is there some special marketing manual that councillors use that says "Stick a 'concerned' grimace on your face - folk won't read your flyer anyway, so this'll get your message across"?
It's just difficult to take actual stories like this seriously - there's no evidence to the reader that the house is actually a dump. You can't see anything for the photo-op hoggers in the foreground.
I think Councillors are a bit trapped when it comes to photos.
If there's one thing more boring than a sad looking person in front of an empty house, it's a picture of an empty house.
You're right that there's no evidence from the photo that the house is derelict. However, I've used my powers of "reading comprehension" to gain that information from the words next to it.
They could set it on fire. This would make their point and create an visually arresting photo-op, but they're probably not allowed to.
I'd rather see the actual dump and the furious neighbours rather than relying on a Cllr's conjecture. Though I understand these are little more than adverts for a political party rather than actual facts that we can draw our own conclusions from, so probably shouldn't care so much.
This councillor has completely misinterpreted glum. What he's looking for is a mixture of the impotent fury of one who has spent his life thanklessly defending the rights of the taxpayer against evil town hall fat cats and the subtle wisdom of a misunderstood soothsayer of urban regeneration.
But he just looks like his mum won't let him have any sweets.
Let's club together and send him to gurning school.
Comments
It's just difficult to take actual stories like this seriously - there's no evidence to the reader that the house is actually a dump. You can't see anything for the photo-op hoggers in the foreground.
But he just looks like his mum won't let him have any sweets.
Let's club together and send him to gurning school.
Are you the crouch end tiger who goes to all the pub quizzes with a friend called highgate dragon?