Anyone use it? I've signed up for it and I just don't get it. Does anyone understand it? I don't see how on earth it's supposed to be useful
I'm going off facebook as well, whereas David - a former sceptic - is a fuly signed up member of facebook pirate battleships.
Comments
The site (on a phone) is really useful to use, you can also send updates via text message, and get friends updates sent as text messages to you for nothing. It does personal (albeit, public ones) messages (online or sms) as well (using things like @andy and @pete at the beginning of a message)
There are also tons of somewhat interesting third-party add-ons
as for what its good for, i think i read it best as "international group text messaging without anything like the cost".
http://www.twitter.com/dazegoonboy
I think its best used for and by the bloggerati types like Cory Doctorow, who would have international friends and a web-presence to maintain
Can we create an account for our youngest ever member?
The main thing about Twitter is that it's primarily for engagement - for engaging with others, organisations - and for those who follow celebrities, to feel that you have a direct line to them. And of course the more followers you have, the more you'll get out of it (unless most of them are spambots) - lots of interesting discussions to be had! (but not with the spambots).
It's also a very good information source - breaking news, local news, and pretty much anything you're interested in. And there's always some meme or another floating around....
There's lots of guides on Google about how to use Twitter and how to get the most out of it, so those should give you some good pointers. And nothing's set in stone - if whoever you're following is boring you silly, unfollow them quickly! - you can always find far more important people.
Personal favourites are the comedy accounts - @betfairpoker, @themanwhofell (a SG local), @wstonesoxfordst, @tffail for transport woes, @its_death - it's worth joining Twitter just to follow them!
Speaking of Twitter, I'm a massive fan. I initially joined three years ago when Andy posted this and like most people abandoned it as I didn't really get the point. Having taken it back up a year ago it's become highly addictive. I find it a great place for keeping in touch with people I know, getting to know people who have similar interests, finding out about local news, sharing links/photos/music etc. I've also met up and become friends with people through Twitter after discovering we have friends and interests in common. I also discovered I was following/being followed by my next door neighbour for over a year without realising and it wasn't until he posted a picture of his house in the snow last Winter that I realised 'hang on that's my house too!'
I agree about Google+ - there was a joke at the time it was launched that people were creating their accounts then simply following people they already follow through Twitter and Facebook. A few friends have been oversharing, so I've unfollowed them, and now it's deathly quiet on there. Apart from jokes about how quiet it is. And it kind of freaks me out having complete strangers following me on there. But it's early days... it's taken both Facebook and Twitter several years to become mainstream.
By launching as invitation only there have been comments that google have created a 'geek island'. Maybe it will become mainstream, who knows? I've never been a fan of FB and use it reluctantly because all my friends do. Social networks only seem to have a limited lifespan on the interweb (e.g. friendsreunited, myspace etc) and I feel that FB is coming to the end of it's lifespan. But hey I might be wrong...
Sort of as Andy said, I've got separate FB & Twitter accounts for work / personal, and it's kind of disconcerting having both merged on Google+ - I LIKE keeping work and personal separate!
On Twitter, it's usually obvious why certain people follow you (unless they're social media gurus and/or spammers), but I have no idea who these people are on Google+.... In theory, though, it'd be good to allow certain people to follow you without having their stuff in your newsfeeds....
Not a fan of FB either - I see it as a necessary evil, and it's irritating the way it's so insecure about its brand identity, it has to keep imitating Twitter and now Google+. And my love of Twitter is largely derived from it being not-Facebook :)
Re riots - I agree, towards the end, pretty much every part of London was under threat, but it was useful to find out what was happening or happened in specific areas. And it's fun to look at nearby tweets....
Also third party apps like Echofon which I use on my mobile allow you to 'mute' somebody without unfollowing them.
I also use hashtag muting apps like mute.ly to filter out things that clog up my timeline (#xfactor on Saturday nights for example)...
I'm going to shut up now cos I'm sounding like a right geek.
Also, it is SO appreciated when company accounts actually take the time to interact with their followers, and it really makes them stand out - I've seen so many criticisms of theatres which either don't reply to tweets, only RT other tweets about themselves (though a few are starting to adopt Storify, thank god) or cross-post from Facebook.
@Four Eyes - Echofon now does muting? Cool, am switching back to them straight away, then! :)