Stephen Fry cracked me up the other night while chattng to Richard Dawkins: "We have witnessed same-sex practices in 420 species, but homophobia in only one... which, exactly, is unnatural?"<br>
I just don't see foraging as a "profession" in the sense of people who make a proper living as full-time foragers, although I concede there must be some (truffle hunters, for instance, and people who sell bits of flaccid seaweed to posh restaurant kitchens). And fishermen count, of course. So, ok.<div><br></div><div>From what I know about bonobos, they're just horny little apes who use casual sex as social interaction, rather than as a bartering tool. Males on females, females on females, males on males, they're all at it, all the time. Sounds only marginally more fun than what barnesbq was describing above. </div>
<P>emine says " i am very happy for consenting adults to do whatever they like to eah other.I wildly encourage it...i stand by the sidelines cheering"</P>
<P>phwooor! i dont know about you but i find that quite sexy,so i will try and charm emine into admitting some more sexy secrets...</P>
<P>although perhaps emine is a bloke pretending to be a bird in which case i take it all back,not that there is anything wrong with being gay,as we have already established we arent homophobics on sg.org im afraid...</P>
<P>emine - say if your randy neighbours are having a bit of saturday night slap and tickle after a trip to the white lion of mortimer and are in the flat upstairs from you and you overhear the man giving his good lady wife a good old spanking on her bare bottom,she's loving every minute of having her botty spanked and shreiking out in pleasure while he is telling her "you deserve this for being a naughty girl" ,are you saying,emine, that you would "stand by the sidelines cheering" your neighbours on in the flat above...perhaps they might find this a bit disconcerting...or even love every minute of it judging by what some of the people on sg.org are like</P>
<P>just askin... </P>
<P>carry on</P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P> </P>
<P>emine says " im not sure chimps trade meat for sex"</P>
<P>im not sure either...</P>
<P>emine continues " from what i know about bonobos they are just horny little apes who use casual sex as social interaction...they are all at it all the time"</P>
<P>this is good writing</P>
<P>keep it up - no pun intended</P>
<P>carry on </P>
<P> </P>
Hilarious! No, I would not ask if they needed my encouragement in that incredibly vivid, detailed scenario. "Carry on" really is an apt sign-off to your post. I would cheer inwardly at their obvious capacity for joy and then turn Radio 4 up REALLY LOUD.
I don't know if this is connected with the aforementioned establishment or just WLM but there have been not 1 but two rent boys spotted 'plying there trade ' in SgR . Hardly 'boys ' as one is 30 going on 50. 2 ppl in WLM mentioned this and the man in the big chemist selling all the vitamins. I thought this was confined to Soho and Brixton but shows how modern SG has become. Pret can't be far off. Chang.
@Misscara, I am sure you could find somebody to pay you some masculine attention without having to pay them. They might not be happy about wearing the vibrating cock ring, though. <br>
Ha ha. There is a 'look' - sort of early Robbie Williams crossed with James Corden in tight clothing with a bit of Reggie Yates and Matthew Kelly. Don't float my boat, but the fact there are 2 (one more James Corden after a rough night ) shows its all goin on on n4. Chang
Respectfully folks, unless someone here has actually been propositioned by, or has direct knowledge of folks who have used the services of either of these (alleged) prostitutes, then I - for one - think it is not right that men who might be seen as outmoded are being identified as rent boys. In addition to which, even if these men are for rent, does it really need to be the topic of repeated discussion? Certainly, I got the message the first time. The repetition does not increase the interest.<br><br>
<div>Chang, since you started this thread nearly six months ago it seems your
main agenda is to smear and spread gossip about a legal business that operates
in the area.</div>
<div>Your latest post regarding your suspicions about ‘rent’ in the WLM is of no
relevance to the original thread whatsoever.</div>
<div>Your comments, if not posted as a question, would be liable against the
business and the individuals concerned.</div>
<div>If you are passionate about this issue, the correct procedure would be call
the police and inform them about illegal activity in the WLM, not just stir up
gossip on this site.</div>
<div>Had you posted this comment on a more widely spread public forum such a
‘Twitter’; your actions could quite easily lead to a hate crime against the
people concerned especially as you have given detailed descriptions.</div>
<div>Should this happen, this would have been incited by you and I’m sure you
are aware of the consequences.</div>
It's Chris - it was an OBSERVATION not a 'smear' . I've no idea or interest in if it is illegal and I am not 'passionate' about it. Keep a sense of proportion mate. Chang.
@It';sChris, speaking about Chang sticking to the facts: you should stick to the facts too. Chang has written nothing to incite any action whatsoever. If I write "Elton John is a homosexual", am I inciting a homophobic hate crime against him? (This is a rhetorical question, as the answer is plainly no). I thought Chang was being quite amusing. <br>
Comments