Stroud Green - Planning Applications

2456721

Comments

  • I'm not getting any results from that planning reference?<br>
  • What news on the redevelopment of the restaurant/bar next to the Station House on Stapleton Hall Road?
  • edited August 2012
    @ActionVerb: Thanks for that.  Is it still supposed to be temporary?  It will end up being something of an underdevelopment, given all the other local plans.<br><br>@gardner-joe: I don't think a decision has been made yet.  I was outvoted on the CAAC, who opposed it on the grounds that any development of the site should be a high-quality modern design.<br>
  • The Design and Access statement looks like its been done by a child.<br><br>Personal favourites are describes the area as having an adequate level of public transport and saying the building will be a "reference point for Finsbuty."<br><br>Horrible looking building, how many years is this proposed for?<br>
  • edited August 2012
    <div style="font-style: normal; ">I'm pretty sure that this is supposed to be a permanent and full redevelopment of the site, replacing the current uses (car wash, fruit/takeaway stall etc), which in theory are temporary. This might be my second ever objection to a planning application (the first one being extended hours for Red Rita, which is now The Fonthill). </div><div style="font-style: normal; "><br></div><div><div>My favourite line from the D&A is: <i>"The area lacks positive urban imagery for </i><span style="font-size: 10pt; "><i>emotional attachment"</i>, closely followed by <i>"</i></span><i><span style="font-size: 10pt; ">The proposal is </span><span style="font-size: 10pt; ">tempted into monolithism by the new long frontage opportunity presented by Stroud Green Road and Wells Terrace"</span></i></div></div>
  • The previous application described it as temporary, but this does look more ‘solid’. Curious, given the rumoured plans of the landowners to build towers on the site in the future, and the likelihood that a much higher (and more lucrative) scheme would probably get planning permission on this site. I might object too – any development here should have an arcade or cut-away on the corner to ease pedestrian flow.
  • Status is "<b>This Application has been deemed invalid".  </b>I'm hoping it was deemed invalid purely for the use of explosion star with the word 'Surprise" as part of the masterplan context.<br><b><br></b>As a temporary building it could be ok if given 10 years or something but as a permanent building no way.  <br>
  • @Arkady: Thanks. On this subject, I Googled and found this ... "New flats proposed for local Stroud Green landmark" http://www.richardwilson.me.uk/2012/08/27/new-flats-proposed-for-local-stroud-green-landmark/
  • New ones in Haringey this week:<br><br>HGY/2012/1632<br>1A Oakfield Road N4 4NH<br>Creation of rear roof terrace and insertion of 3 front and 4 rear rooflights<br>Date Registered: 20/08/2012<br><br>HGY/2012/1638<br>172 Stapleton Hall Road N4 4QL<br>Erection of lower ground floor rear extension<br>Date Registered: 20/08/2012<br><br>HGY/2012/1641<br>Flat 1, 92 Upper Tollington Park N4 4NB<br>Erection of rear dormer and roof terrace and insertion of rooflights to front/rear elevation<br>Date Registered: 21/08/2012<br><br>HGY/2012/1651<br>31 Victoria Road N4 3SJ<br>Conversion of existing property into two self contained flats<br>Date Registered: 23/08/2012<br><br>HGY/2012/1670<br>26 Perth Road N4 3HB<br>Erection of ground floor and part first floor rear extension<br>Date Registered: 24/08/2012
  • HGY/2012/1824<br>115 Florence Road N4 4DL<br>Erection of PVCu conservatory to rear of property<br>Date Registered: 20/09/2012<br><br>HGY/2012/1832<br>Flat 4, 99 Upper Tollington Park N4 4ND<br>Retrospective planning application for retention of existing windows<br>Date Registered: 21/09/2012
  • HGY/2012/1975<br>Flat 2 152 Stapleton Hall Road N4 4QJ<br>Erection of balcony at rear ground floor level
  • A few interesting Islington applications.<br><br><a href="https://www.islington.gov.uk/onlineplanning/docserver/docs.jsp?caseId=P122070">The Noble may become a private residence!  Campaign against this anyone?</a><br><br><a href="https://www.islington.gov.uk/onlineplanning/docserver/docs.jsp?caseId=P121537">They have resubmitted plans for the corner by the bus-station.</a><br><br><a href="https://www.islington.gov.uk/onlineplanning/docserver/docs.jsp?caseId=P122013">The little shop next to the World's End on Lennox Road will become accomodation.</a><br><br><a href="https://www.islington.gov.uk/onlineplanning/docserver/docs.jsp?caseId=P122159">Some work on a Crouch Hill/Mount Pleasant property - within the Conservation Area. Worth a look.</a><br>
  • edited October 2012
  • I'll join any campaign against turning the Noble into an empty shop with some flats above.<br>
  • Sorry, I've been slacking.<br><br>This week's apps:<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0830<br>38 Oakfield Road N4 4NL</b><br>Construction of 1 x two storey, two bed dwelling to rear of property with rooms at basement level<br>Date Registered: 13/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0832<br> 11 Elyne Road N4 4RA</b><br> Installation of soil vent pipe to front elevaiton,with associated internal alterations (householder application)<br>Date Registered: 13/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0848<br>Flat 4, 24 Ferme Park Road N4 4ED</b><br>Formation of rear roof terrace with privacy screen to side<br>Date Registered: 14/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0853<br>31 Mount Pleasant Crescent N4 4HP</b><br>Demolition of existing side return and erection of new single storey side return and rear extension (householder<br>application)<br>Date Registered: 14/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0854<br>65 Woodstock Road N4 3ET</b><br>Landscaping and new refuse enclosure to front area including new opening in existing front brick garden wall<br>Date Registered: 14/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0856<br>75 Florence Road N4 4DL</b><br>Conversion of existing property into two self-contained flats<br>Date Registered: 14/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0859<br>38A Mount View Road N4 4HX</b><br>Reconfiguration of front entrance with associated internal alterations<br>Date Registered: 15/05/2013<br><br><b>HGY/2013/0878<br>58 Victoria Road N4 3SL</b><br>Erection of single storey rear extension and conversion of property into 3 x two bed flats<br>Date Registered: 15/05/2013<br><b><br>HGY/2013/0890<br>48 Stapleton Hall Road N4 3QG</b><br>Demolition of existing shed and erection of new shed between boundary wall and wall of house (householder<br>application)<br>Date Registered: 15/05/2013<br>
  • Not directly relevant, but I was reminded of it yesterday, it's been bugging me for years, and this is as good a place as any to ask - <div><br></div><div>Ferme Park Road, right at the top of the hill, there are about four houses with raised, concrete front gardens. Why? They're raised, so no use as parking, and they're remarkably bleak for an otherwise pretty area.</div>
  • HGY/2013/0978<br>25 Upper Tollington Park N4 3EJ<br>Alteration of property from 7 bedroom HMO (House in Multiple Occupation) to 2x two bed self-contained flats<br>Date Registered: 29/05/2013<br><br>HGY/2013/0990<br>75 Victoria Road N4 3SW<br>Erection of rear singelstorey extension into side return (householder application)<br>Date Registered: 30/05/2013<br><br>GY/2013/1020<br>146 Ferme Park Road N8 9SE<br>Erection of rear single storey extension<br>Date Registered: 31/05/2013
  • @ADGS - no idea, but I agree they are unsightly.<br>
  • <i>"<span style="font-family: 'lucida grande', 'Lucida Sans Unicode', tahoma, sans-serif; line-height: 20.796875px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Alteration of property from 7 bedroom HMO (House in Multiple Occupation) to 2x two bed self-contained flats"</span></i><div style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'lucida grande', 'Lucida Sans Unicode', tahoma, sans-serif; line-height: 20.796875px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><br></span></div><div style="font-style: normal;"><span style="font-family: 'lucida grande', 'Lucida Sans Unicode', tahoma, sans-serif; line-height: 20.796875px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Gentrification in action.</span></div>
  • edited July 2013
    HGY/2013/1492<br>38 Quernmore Road N4 4QP<br>Installation of new shopfront<br>Date Registered: 26/07/2013<br><br>Anyone who doewn't like the idea of an original Victorian shopfront being replaced, rather than restored, might want to comment on this one.<br><br>You can do so here: http://www.planningservices.haringey.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServlet?PKID=269184<br>;
  • edited December 2013
    Let's see if I can get back into the habit of doing this again:<div><br></div><div><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">HGY/2013/2383</span><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">20 Scarborough Road N4 4LT</span><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Formation of rear dormer, insertion of front and rear rooflights and alterations to rear fenestration (householder</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">application)</div><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Date Registered: 22/11/2013</span><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">HGY/2013/2399</span><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">137 Mount View Road N4 4JH</span><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Erection of rear lower ground floor extension (householder application)</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Date Registered: 27/11/2013</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">HGY/2013/2408</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-size: 12pt;">19 Ossian Road N4 4DX</span></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><div>Creation of front and rear lightwells with access steps and replacement of existing loft window with full height French doors (householder application)</div></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Date Registered: 27/11/2013</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br></div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">HGY/2013/2446</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">66 Mount View Road N4 4JR<br>Erection of single storey rear extension at lower ground floor level with roof terrace above</div><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Date Registered: 29/11/2013</div></div>
  • <span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">HGY/2013/2456</span><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><b style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">33A Woodstock Road N4 3ET</b><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><span style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);">Replacement of existing sash windows with PVC double-glazed windows</span><br style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><b style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">Date Registered: 02/12/2013</b><div><b style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;"><br></b></div><div><b style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">No!!!</b></div>
  • Why on earth was SG designated a conservation area if the council won't stop applications like that one??
  • Why on earth was the development around the station allowed?  To turn it into another bland station area?
  • The user and all related content has been deleted.
  • It won't be as big as Westfields but I'm so sad that certain property magnets hive off people with good intentions who wanted something better around the area.  I'd prefer sash windows everywhere than this development been given the red light.
  • New homes? New jobs? Regenerating a run down, low quality area? Hmmm, yeah, shocking decision Islington Council....
Sign In or Register to comment.